Export limit exceeded: 418251 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16155 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-120340 | 1 Mathurvishal | 1 Cloudclassroom-php-project | 2026-11-02 | 3.7 Low |
| A weakness has been identified in mathurvishal CloudClassroom-PHP-Project. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Global Session Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to session expiration. The attack may be launched remotely. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. This product operates on a rolling release basis, ensuring continuous delivery. Consequently, there are no version details for either affected or updated releases. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114643 | 1 Mongodb | 1 C# Driver | 2026-11-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| The MongoDB C# Driver writes GeoJSON extra members without checking whether their names collide with reserved GeoJSON members such as type and coordinates. An application that places user-supplied field names into these extra members can store documents with duplicate geometry fields, so the server and the driver resolve different values for the same record. Affected records can also become unreadable through the driver, interrupting application code that reads them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20713 | 1 Intel | 381 Xeon 6315p, Xeon 6315p Firmware, Xeon 6325p and 378 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.5 High |
| Always-incorrect control flow implementation in some firmware for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113511 | 1 Apache | 1 Syncope | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Apache Syncope. A delegated administrator can relocate a Realm subtree across administrative realm boundaries without permission for the destination This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 through 4.0.8, from 4.1.0-M0 through 4.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.9 / 4.1.4, which fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113687 | 1 Apache | 1 Syncope | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Improper isolation or compartmentalization vulnerability in Apache Syncope. An administrator with adequate entitlements for Implementations can create a malicious Groovy class running untrusted code on a separate Thread, thus bypassing the Groovy security sandbox. This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 through 4.0.8, from 4.1.0-M0 through 4.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.9 / 4.1.4, which fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109083 | 1 Apache | 1 Syncope | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Improper isolation or compartmentalization vulnerability in Apache Syncope. An administrator with adequate entitlements can import arbitrary BPMN process definitions via the REST API and then start the process. When a BPMN process containing a JUEL expression is imported and started, the expression is executed directly on the server, with no sandbox. This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 through 4.0.8, from 4.1.0 through 4.1.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.9 / 4.1.4, which fix this issue by rejecting BPMN definitions including expression attributes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120427 | 1 Mrdoc | 1 Mrdoc | 2026-11-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| MrDoc through 1.1.1 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the get_doctemp view that allows authenticated users to read other users' document templates. Attackers can enumerate the sequential doctemp_id POST parameter to retrieve the private template content of every user on the instance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120426 | 2026-11-02 | 7.5 High | ||
| OpenCSG CSGHub through v2.6.0-ce contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the unauthenticated file resolve route that allows remote attackers to read private repository files. Attackers can inject a percent-encoded current_user parameter into the file path, which the portal forwards with its server API key, to read files in private model, code or space repositories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20702 | 1 Intel | 2 Data Center Attestation Primitives, Dcap | 2026-11-02 | 10.0 Critical |
| Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Data Center Attestation Primitives (Intel(R) DCAP) may allow information disclosure. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115998 | 1 Cervantessec | 1 Cervantes | 2026-11-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| IDOR in Cervantes version v1.3-beta could allow an authenticated attacker ca access sensitive findings, proof-of-concept details, credentials, and client information from projects they do not belong to. Additionally, they can modify finding statuses and transfer findings to their own projects, compromising data confidentiality and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115994 | 1 Cervantessec | 1 Cervantes | 2026-11-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| BOLA Allows Cross-Project Target Tampering in Cervantes version v1.3-beta could allow an attacker modify or delete targets belonging to other projects without authorization, compromising the integrity of penetration testing scopes, results, and associated security reports. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77026 | 1 Tassos.gr | 1 Convert Forms Component For Joomia | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - tassos.gr - Client-controlled validation bypass in Convert Forms extension 1.0.0-4.4.16, 5.0.0-5.2.5 - CAPTCHA and field validation bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115519 | 1 Knime | 1 Business Hub | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Missing security attributes on sensitive cookies in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to compromise user sessions if other security issues such as a cross-site scripting vulnerability or a man-in-the-middle attack are present. A workaround is not possible. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115517 | 1 Knime | 1 Business Hub | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Unrestricted network access between execution contexts in KNIME Business Hub before version 1.19.0 allows an authenticated remote user to access open network ports on executors in different execution contexts. This only poses a security issue if the IP address of the attacked executor is know and there are open network ports that provided access without further authentication. By default no network ports are open. However, depending on the running workflows, ports may be opened and provide an attack surface. As a workaround, network policies can be created manually. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115416 | 1 Aws | 1 Amazon Athena | 2026-11-02 | 7.7 High |
| Incorrect authorization checks in Amazon Athena engine version 3 query processing could have allowed an authenticated user to read AWS account identifiers and SQL statement text query metadata from other AWS accounts. Query results, and data stored in Amazon S3 or other data sources, were not accessible through this issue. AWS remediated the issue on October 7, 2026. No customer action is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82559 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Insufficient session expiration in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.WebSocketSettings#newWebSocketRequest() wraps the WebSocket upgrade request in an org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.api.ServletRequestCopy, which is kept for the life of the connection and used to build the request for every frame that arrives on it. Copying the request is deliberate and is documented as such, because the container recycles the upgrade request once the handshake is over. The container session is copied along with it, into an org.apache.wicket.protocol.ws.api.HttpSessionCopy holding the session attributes as they stood when the connection was opened. That second copy is not necessary, because a session, unlike a request, is not discarded at the end of a request. Every frame afterwards resolves its Wicket session through ISessionStore#lookup(), which reads it out of the copy, so the connection is detached from the live container session for as long as it stays open. Ending the session through the container therefore does not end the connection. After an idle timeout, an HttpSession#invalidate() call made from a filter or from a security framework, a container-managed logout, or a session replacement, the connection goes on resolving the org.apache.wicket.Session instance that existed when it was opened, together with that session's attributes and, for applications built on wicket-auth-roles, the signed-in state held on that same instance, so an authorization decision taken inside a WebSocket callback is taken against an identity that has already been revoked. The copy is also what the connection writes through: a Session#invalidateNow() issued from inside a WebSocket callback invalidates the copy and leaves the container session valid, and session attributes set over the connection are written to the copy rather than to the session. An application is affected where it uses Wicket's native WebSocket support on pages or shared resources that require an authenticated session, and where sessions are ended by the container rather than by Wicket. Session#invalidateNow(), and AuthenticatedWebSession#invalidate() and #signOut() which call it, remain effective for a WebSocketBehavior on a page: they clear the page manager, and the connection can then no longer resolve the page it was opened for. A WebSocketResource is not limited in that way, because a frame naming a resource is served against a throwaway page and never consults the page manager, so such a connection outlives Wicket's own sign-out as well. Some containers close WebSocket connections themselves when the HTTP session they were opened under is destroyed, in which case the connection ends regardless; that is a property of the container rather than of Wicket. Applications that do not use the native WebSocket support are not affected. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.19.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Older, unsupported releases from 6.0.0 onwards are also affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.20.0, 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82898 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Incorrect order of security checks in Apache Wicket. org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener obtains the page a request targets before it consults its resource isolation policies, because those policies are passed that page. Obtaining the page instantiates it, and instantiating a page runs the configured org.apache.wicket.authorization.IAuthorizationStrategy. An application that refuses an unauthenticated visitor by throwing org.apache.wicket.RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException therefore throws it from inside the isolation listener, before any policy has run. That exception replaces the request handler, so the policies are never consulted and a request that came from another origin is not refused. The exception's constructor stores the URL of the request it interrupted, so that Component#continueToOriginalDestination() can resume it once the visitor has signed in. The stored URL is the one the policies would have refused. On sign in Wicket redirects to it, and that redirect is same-origin, so the policies allow it and the listener runs in the newly authenticated session. The whole URL is stored, its query string included, so an ordinary org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form is resumed with the field values the original request carried in its query string and Form#onSubmit() runs with values another origin chose. A form POST is not needed for this; a plain top-level navigation carries them. An application is affected where it registers ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener, which is opt-in and is not registered by default, and where it refuses unauthorized access with RestartResponseAtInterceptPageException followed by continueToOriginalDestination(). No application override is involved on that path: IAuthorizationStrategy#isInstantiationAuthorized() documents throwing that exception, org.apache.wicket.authroles.authentication.AuthenticatedWebApplication throws it and org.apache.wicket.authroles.authentication.panel.UsernamePasswordPanel continues to the original destination, and org.apache.wicket.authorization.strategies.page.SimplePageAuthorizationStrategy in wicket-core installs the same pattern. A visitor who is already signed in is not affected, because no interception occurs. Request-body parameters stored alongside the intercepted URL are not applied to the resumed form: the resumption is a redirect, so the resumed request is a GET, and form components read their values from the query string on a GET. As a workaround, refuse unauthorized access with org.apache.wicket.RestartResponseException instead, which does not store the original destination; visitors are then not returned to the page they asked for after signing in. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 9.1.0 through 9.24.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.11.0. Releases before 9.1.0, which is every 8.x release and 9.0.0, are not affected, because the resource isolation this issue concerns was introduced in 9.1.0. They are not protected either. Their only cross-origin defence is org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.CsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener, which works out where a request came from by reading its Origin header and falling back to its Referer header. Neither header need arrive: a browser does not send Origin on the plain GET a link uses, and the document on the other origin decides through its own referrer policy whether a Referer reaches the application at all. That mechanism therefore never made the guarantee the Fetch Metadata based policy makes, and on those releases a listener invocation from another origin is not reliably refused in the first place. Anyone on a release before 9.1.0 who wants this protection should upgrade to 9.x or 10.x and register ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 9.25.0 or 10.12.0, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87718 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Apache Wicket 10.10.0, 10.11.0 and 9.24.0 do not set the Content-Security-Policy headers on a page whose render request handler is wrapped in more than one IRequestHandlerDelegate. The framework unwraps only a single delegate level when deciding whether a request renders a page, so with a deeper chain, for example an application-provided delegating request mapper combined with CryptoMapper, the page is served without any CSP header even though CSP is enabled, and no error or warning is raised. The nonce-based protection Wicket applies to inline scripts and styles, together with any other CSP directives configured by the application, is thereby lost for those pages, exposing them to content injection the policy was meant to prevent. Applications on stock Wicket that do not wrap request handlers themselves are not affected. Versions before 10.10.0 and 9.24.0 handled nested delegates correctly. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.12.0 or 9.25.0, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103310 | 2026-11-02 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The PayHere Payment Gateway WordPress plugin from 2.4.0 through 2.4.5 does not verify the authenticity of payment notifications when the merchant secret is unset, which is the default state, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a payment confirmation and mark any order as paid without payment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120341 | 1 Mathurvishal | 1 Cloudclassroom-php-project | 2026-11-02 | 7.3 High |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in mathurvishal CloudClassroom-PHP-Project. Impacted is an unknown function of the file studentdetails.php. The manipulation leads to execution after redirect. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||