| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| NEXTWEB (i)Site stores databases under the web document root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request to databases/Users.mdb. |
| ZKTeco ZKAccess Professional 3.5.3 contains an insecure file permissions vulnerability that allows authenticated users to escalate privileges by modifying executable files. Attackers can leverage the Modify permission granted to the Authenticated Users group to replace executable binaries with malicious code for privilege escalation. |
| EverSync 0.5 contains an arbitrary file download vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive files by requesting them directly from the files directory. Attackers can send GET requests to the files directory to download database files like db.sq3 containing application data and credentials. |
| The GLPI Inventory Plugin handles various types of tasks for GLPI agents, including network discovery and inventory (SNMP), software deployment, VMWare ESX host remote inventory, and data collection (files, Windows registry, WMI). Versions prior to 1.5.0 have an improper access control vulnerability. Version 1.5.0 fixes the vulnerability. |
| CWE-552: Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability over https exists that could leak
information and potential privilege escalation following man in the middle attack. |
| Longjing Technology BEMS API versions up to and including 1.21 contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file download vulnerability in the 'downloads' endpoint. The 'fileName' parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing attackers to craft traversal sequences and access sensitive files outside the intended directory. |
| Rapid7 Velociraptor MSI Installer versions below 0.73.3 suffer from a vulnerability whereby it creates the installation directory with WRITE_DACL permission to the BUILTIN\\Users group. This allows local users who are not administrators to grant themselves the Full Control permission on Velociraptor's files. By modifying Velociraptor's files, local users can subvert the binary and cause the Velociraptor service to execute arbitrary code as the SYSTEM user, or to replace the Velociraptor binary completely. This issue is fixed in version 0.73.3. |
| Improper access control vulnerability in Apaczka plugin for PrestaShop allows information gathering from saved templates without authentication.This issue affects Apaczka plugin for PrestaShop from v1 through v4. |
| wolfictl is a command line tool for working with Wolfi. A git authentication issue in versions prior to 0.16.10 allows a local user’s GitHub token to be sent to remote servers other than `github.com`. Most git-dependent functionality in wolfictl relies on its own `git` package, which contains centralized logic for implementing interactions with git repositories. Some of this functionality requires authentication in order to access private repositories. A central function `GetGitAuth` looks for a GitHub token in the environment variable `GITHUB_TOKEN` and returns it as an HTTP basic auth object to be used with the `github.com/go-git/go-git/v5` library. Most callers (direct or indirect) of `GetGitAuth` use the token to authenticate to github.com only; however, in some cases callers were passing this authentication without checking that the remote git repository was hosted on github.com. This behavior has existed in one form or another since commit 0d06e1578300327c212dda26a5ab31d09352b9d0 - committed January 25, 2023. This impacts anyone who ran the `wolfictl check update` commands with a Melange configuration that included a `git-checkout` directive step that referenced a git repository not hosted on github.com. This also impacts anyone who ran `wolfictl update <url>` with a remote URL outside of github.com. Additionally, these subcommands must have run with the `GITHUB_TOKEN` environment variable set to a valid GitHub token. Users should upgrade to version 0.16.10 to receive a patch. |
| AshPostgres is the PostgreSQL data layer for Ash Framework. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.4.10, in certain very specific situations, it was possible for the policies of an update action to be skipped. This occurred only on "empty" update actions (no changing fields), and would allow their hooks (side effects) to be performed when they should not have been. Note that this does not allow reading new data that the user should not have had access to, only triggering a side effect a user should not have been able to trigger.
To be vulnerable, an affected user must have an update action that is on a resource with no attributes containing an "update default" (updated_at timestamp, for example); can be performed atomically; does not have `require_atomic? false`; has at least one authorizer (typically `Ash.Policy.Authorizer`); and has at least one `change` (on the resource's `changes` block or in the action itself). This is where the side-effects would be performed when they should not have been.
This problem has been patched in `2.4.10` of `ash_postgres`. Several workarounds are available. Potentially affected users may determine that none of their actions are vulnerable using a script the maintainers provide in the GitHub Security Advisory, add `require_atomic? false` to any potentially affected update action, replace any usage of `Ash.update` with `Ash.bulk_update` for an affected action, and/or add an update timestamp to their action. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.80). Affected devices do not properly limit the path accessible via their webserver. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the filesystem of affected devices. |
| The CAYIN Technology CMS lacks proper access control, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to download arbitrary CGI files. |
| An information-disclosure vulnerability exists in Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT application prior to version 7.7.0 that allows external access to the resources in certain admin root folders. |
| due to insufficient sanitazation in Vega’s `convert()` function when `safeMode` is enabled and the spec variable is an array. An attacker can craft a malicious Vega diagram specification that will allow them to send requests to any URL, including local file system paths, leading to exposure of sensitive information. |
| An attacker could obtain firmware files and reverse engineer their
intended use leading to loss of confidentiality and integrity of the
hardware devices enabled by the Qardio iOS and Android applications. |
| Elevation of Privileges in the cleaning feature of Gen Digital CCleaner version 6.33.11465 on Windows allows a local user to gain SYSTEM privileges via exploiting insecure file delete operations. Reported in CCleaner v. 6.33.11465. This issue affects CCleaner: before < 6.36.11508. |
| The web portal on airpointer 2.4.107-2 was vulnerable local file inclusion. A malicious user with administrative privileges in the web portal would be able to manipulate requests to view files on the filesystem |
| Multiple Brother driver installers for Windows contain a privilege escalation vulnerability. If exploited, an arbitrary program may be executed with the administrative privilege. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the respective vendors listed under [References]. |
| Files or directories accessible to external parties issue exists in SS1 Ver.16.0.0.10 and earlier (Media version:16.0.0a and earlier). If exploited, uploaded files and SS1 configuration files may be accessed by a remote unauthenticated attacker. |
| dstack is a software development kit (SDK) to simplify the deployment of arbitrary containerized apps into trusted execution environments. In versions of dstack prior to 0.5.4, a malicious host may provide a crafted LUKS2 data volume to a dstack CVM for use as the `/data` mount. The guest will open the volume and write secret data using a volume key known to the attacker, causing disclosure of Wireguard keys and other secret information. The attacker can also pre-load data on the device, which could potentially compromise guest execution. LUKS2 volume metadata is not authenticated and supports null key-encryption algorithms, allowing an attacker to create a volume such that the volume opens (cryptsetup open) without error using any passphrase or token, records all writes in plaintext (or ciphertext with an attacker-known key), and/or contains arbitrary data chosen by the attacker. Version 0.5.4 of dstack contains a patch that addresses LUKS headers. |
