Export limit exceeded: 16364 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16364 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-119576 | 1 Arcadedata | 1 Arcadedb | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| ArcadeDB from 21.12.1 before 26.10.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows users with only readRecord to replace the shared GraphQL schema via the read-only query endpoint. Attackers can send a GraphQL type definition with a crafted @sql directive to /api/v1/query/{database}, altering query results returned to other users including administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115712 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elastic Cloud Enterprise | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Elastic Cloud Enterprise (ECE) can lead to unauthorized modification of platform-level settings via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An authenticated user with read-only access to the platform can change an installation-wide account setting that only platform administrators are permitted to change. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119682 | 2026-10-30 | N/A | ||
| An improper access control vulnerability exists in the multi-factor authentication (MFA) functionality of ManageEngine SharePoint Manager Plus (SPMP). A low-privileged authenticated user can bypass authorization checks to read and modify MFA configuration settings, enable or disable MFA for the application, enumerate MFA-enrolled users, and delete MFA-enrolled accounts. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to weaken authentication protections or cause a denial of service by configuring invalid MFA settings, potentially locking legitimate users out of the application. This vulnerability was fixed in build 4507. The reproduction explicitly uses build 4506. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118101 | 2026-10-30 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The BuddyForms WordPress plugin before 2.10.1 does not verify that a user editing an existing entry is the author of the target post, allowing users who have been granted edit access to a form, as low as Subscriber, to overwrite the title, content and status of any other user's posts or pages, including those of administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119551 | 1 Jellyfin | 1 Jellyfin | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Jellyfin through 12.4 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in SuggestionsController.GetSuggestions that allows authenticated non-administrator users to bypass library and parental restrictions by omitting the userId parameter. Attackers can repeatedly call GET /Items/Suggestions without userId to enumerate restricted items, including IDs and server filesystem paths, and then stream them. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119550 | 1 Jellyfin | 1 Jellyfin | 2026-10-30 | 3.5 Low |
| Jellyfin through 12.4 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in PlaylistsController.GetPlaylist that allows authenticated users to read hidden item IDs by requesting public or shared playlists. Restricted or parental-controlled users can obtain GUIDs of inaccessible library items from unfiltered playlist ItemIds and then stream that hidden media. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119377 | 1 Sqlite | 1 Sqlite | 2026-10-30 | 2.5 Low |
| SQLite before 3.54.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in lookupName() that invokes the authorizer only for the first joined table's USING column. Attackers able to submit SQL can query a shared USING column in a RIGHT or FULL JOIN to read columns denied via sqlite3_set_authorizer() SQLITE_READ restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118952 | 1 Redhat | 1 Amq Streams | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Kroxylicious ACL authorizer. Its prefix-matching logic may apply a rule to a principal of a different type, or fail to check a broader matching rule when prefixes overlap. Depending on the ACL configuration, this may allow an authenticated Kafka client to access a resource (such as read a topic) that should be denied. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118542 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118541 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118540 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41, from 3.0.0 to 3.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97406 | 1 Xerj | 1 Console Api | 2026-10-29 | 9.1 Critical |
| XERJ Console API bearer tokens can bypass the passkey‑only authentication requirement and directly invoke the API‑token creation endpoint, allowing unauthorized minting of persistent successor credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112455 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Tvos and 2 more | 2026-10-29 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7.2 and iPadOS 26.7.2, iOS 27.2 and iPadOS 27.2, macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2, tvOS 27.2, visionOS 27.2, watchOS 27.2. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48884 | 2 Wedevs, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Wp User Frontend, Wp User Frontend | 2026-10-29 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in weDevs WP User Frontend wp-user-frontend allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP User Frontend: from n/a through 4.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87352 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools | 2026-10-29 | 4.4 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: LDAP). Supported versions that are affected are 8.61-8.63. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools executes to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-72825 | 1 Getgrav | 2 Grav, Grav-plugin-api | 2026-10-29 | 7.6 High |
| The getgrav/grav-plugin-api plugin before 1.0.13 contains an API-key scope cap bypass in the POST /reports/twig-content/allowlist endpoint (ReportsController). The endpoint enforces requirePermission('api.config.write') followed by a bare isSuperAdmin() check instead of requireSuper(). Because isSuperAdmin() reads access.api.super directly and never consults api_key_scopes, a least-privilege API key scoped to api.config.write minted on a super account passes the gate, allowing an attacker to append attacker-chosen tokens to the security.twig_sandbox allowlist (persisted to user/config/security.yaml). Widening the allowlist turns any subsequent Twig-in-content render into an SSTI/RCE sink. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114490 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 7.8 High |
| Incorrect authorization in the COM administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - a credential an administrator may create meaning to confine it to those domains - to act as the whole-server administrator over COM. Administrator roles are meant to confine such a credential to the domains its list names, and the REST API did not take it for the server administrator, but the COM API's server-administrator check read the administer_server permission as the whole server whatever list the grant carried. So the credential signed in through the Control Panel, or through a script run on the server, as the server administrator of every domain: it could read and change every domain's accounts and mail, rename any domain, map a domain alias onto any, write the server's settings and secrets, and create further server-administrator accounts. The COM API's domain-administrator check, asked with no domain, likewise let an account assigned the domainadmin role with a list of domains that leaves out the account's own domain administer that domain's ordinary accounts over COM. An account holding serveradmin with no list is the server administrator by design and is unaffected, as are the help desk, auditor and custom roles. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114489 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 8.1 High |
| Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants' mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule's bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server's own addresses, a configured route's stored credentials or a function of the server's event script, and set the domain's relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server's own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the handlers were not given the caller; over COM the domain-alias save performed no authorization check at all, the domain rename required only a domain administrator, and a rule save required at most that the caller could change the rule's owner. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114477 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 4.3 Medium |
| Missing authorization in the REST metrics route of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to read the server-wide traffic history. GET /api/v1/metrics/history returns the server's traffic counters over the last 30 days; those counters are server-wide and carry no domain, which is why the report routes already refuse the same counters to a credential confined to named domains. The metrics route was not among the routes the server's authorization gate refuses a confined credential and its handler was not given the caller, so a domain administrator, an account given another role that holds view_configuration in named domains (the auditor role given a domain list among them), or an API key issued for named domains could read the whole server's traffic totals rather than its own domains'. The disclosure is of aggregate operational counters, not of any message or account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114476 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-29 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect authorization in the REST administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential holds the manage_roles permission in named domains - a full-scope API key issued for those domains, or an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - to obtain the server administrator's authority. An account's admin level gives it authority, and a role assigned to it replaces that authority, which is how an administrator narrows an account whose admin level is the server administrator's. The route that takes a role away (DELETE /api/v1/role-assignments/{address}) checked only that the credential takes in what the account held at the time, not what it would hold afterwards, so such a credential could take a narrowing role away from an account in its domains whose admin level is the server administrator's, returning it to the server administrator's authority, and, having set that account's password while it held the narrower role, sign in as the server administrator. | ||||